Jamaica vs Syrian Arab Republic: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 55.93 against 55.46 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Jamaica ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.72 | 54.61 | 7.89 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 60.79 | 55.46 | 5.33 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Jamaica or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Jamaica, at 55.93 against 55.46 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Jamaica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.47, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.