Japan vs Tajikistan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 72.46 against 72.06 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Japan ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.58 | 74.9 | 10.32 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 72.59 | 70.14 | 2.45 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Japan or Tajikistan?
- Japan, at 72.46 against 72.06 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Japan and Tajikistan?
- 0.4, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Tajikistan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.