Kiribati vs Luxembourg: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Kiribati
55.48
in 2014
Luxembourg
56.75
in 2014
Kiribati rank
136th
Luxembourg rank
133rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Luxembourg
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 56.75 against 55.48 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.27.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 136th and Luxembourg ranks 133rd of 181 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 55.47 56.68 1.21 Luxembourg
2010s 55.48 56.74 1.26 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 56.75 against 55.48 in Kiribati as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Luxembourg?
1.27, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Kiribati and Luxembourg rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Kiribati ranks 136th and Luxembourg ranks 133rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.