Korea, Rep. vs Malawi: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Korea, Rep.
70.99
in 2014
Malawi
71.07
in 2014
Korea, Rep. rank
73rd
Malawi rank
71st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Korea, Rep.
  • Malawi
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 71.07 against 70.99 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Korea, Rep. ahead.

Korea, Rep. ranks 73rd and Malawi ranks 71st of 181 countries.

Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Rep. Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 70.22 64.81 5.41 Korea, Rep.
2010s 70.72 69.74 0.9816 Korea, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Korea, Rep. or Malawi?
Malawi, at 71.07 against 70.99 in Korea, Rep. as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Korea, Rep. and Malawi?
0.08, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Malawi?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Korea, Rep. and Malawi rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Korea, Rep. ranks 73rd and Malawi ranks 71st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.