Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Taiwan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Taiwan
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 80.53 against 80.19 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd and Taiwan ranks 35th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.19 | 80.19 | 0.0042 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 78.01 | 80.19 | 2.18 | Taiwan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Taiwan?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 80.53 against 80.19 in Taiwan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan?
- 0.34, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd and Taiwan ranks 35th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.