Kuwait vs Mauritius: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Kuwait
65.61
in 2014
Mauritius
65.95
in 2014
Kuwait rank
96th
Mauritius rank
93rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Kuwait
  • Mauritius
203040506070200420092014

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 65.95 against 65.61 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.34.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 96th and Mauritius ranks 93rd of 181 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 66.48 30.94 35.53 Kuwait
2010s 67.94 65.39 2.56 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Kuwait or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 65.95 against 65.61 in Kuwait as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Kuwait and Mauritius?
0.34, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Mauritius?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Kuwait and Mauritius rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Kuwait ranks 96th and Mauritius ranks 93rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.