Kyrgyzstan vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 96.66 against 93.25 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.41.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.05 | 90.91 | 14.86 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 91.43 | 92.87 | 1.44 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Kyrgyzstan or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 96.66 against 93.25 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 3.41, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.