Lesotho vs South Africa: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Lesotho
- South Africa
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 66.62 against 66.02 in South Africa, a difference of 0.6.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Africa ahead.
Lesotho ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.71 | 58.43 | 6.72 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 58.02 | 65.26 | 7.24 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Lesotho or South Africa?
- Lesotho, at 66.62 against 66.02 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Lesotho and South Africa?
- 0.6, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Lesotho and South Africa rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Lesotho ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.