Lesotho vs Vanuatu: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Lesotho
66.62
in 2014
Vanuatu
66.95
in 2014
Lesotho rank
89th
Vanuatu rank
88th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Vanuatu
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 66.95 against 66.62 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 89th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 51.71 38.99 12.72 Lesotho
2010s 58.02 56.44 1.58 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Lesotho or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 66.95 against 66.62 in Lesotho as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Lesotho and Vanuatu?
0.33, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Vanuatu?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Lesotho and Vanuatu rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Lesotho ranks 89th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.