Madagascar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Madagascar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 48.66 against 47.52 in Madagascar, a difference of 1.14.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Madagascar ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.38 | 42.21 | 0.1704 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 47.55 | 47.98 | 0.4371 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Madagascar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 48.66 against 47.52 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Madagascar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.14, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Madagascar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Madagascar ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.