Madagascar vs Suriname: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Madagascar
47.52
in 2014
Suriname
48.49
in 2014
Madagascar rank
157th
Suriname rank
156th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Madagascar
  • Suriname
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 48.49 against 47.52 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.97.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 156th of 181 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 43.13 29.22 13.91 Madagascar
2010s 47.55 32.14 15.4 Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Madagascar or Suriname?
Suriname, at 48.49 against 47.52 in Madagascar as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Madagascar and Suriname?
0.97, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Madagascar and Suriname rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Madagascar ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 156th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.