Malawi vs Thailand: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Malawi
71.07
in 2014
Thailand
70.92
in 2014
Malawi rank
71st
Thailand rank
74th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malawi
  • Thailand
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 71.07 against 70.92 in Thailand, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Thailand ahead.

Malawi ranks 71st and Thailand ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 64.81 74.05 9.24 Thailand
2010s 69.74 71.46 1.72 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Malawi or Thailand?
Malawi, at 71.07 against 70.92 in Thailand as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Malawi and Thailand?
0.15, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Thailand?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Malawi and Thailand rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Malawi ranks 71st and Thailand ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.