Malaysia vs Serbia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Malaysia
71.25
in 2014
Serbia
71.99
in 2014
Malaysia rank
69th
Serbia rank
66th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malaysia
  • Serbia
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 71.99 against 71.25 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.74.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 181 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 50.45 58.74 8.3 Serbia
2010s 68.87 72.46 3.59 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 71.99 against 71.25 in Malaysia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Serbia?
0.74, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Serbia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Malaysia and Serbia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Malaysia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.