Malaysia vs Seychelles: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Malaysia
71.25
in 2014
Seychelles
71
in 2014
Malaysia rank
69th
Seychelles rank
72nd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malaysia
  • Seychelles
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 71.25 against 71 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.25.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.

Malaysia ranks 69th and Seychelles ranks 72nd of 181 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 50.37 68.84 18.47 Seychelles
2010s 68.87 71 2.13 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Seychelles?
Malaysia, at 71.25 against 71 in Seychelles as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Seychelles?
0.25, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Seychelles?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Malaysia and Seychelles rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Malaysia ranks 69th and Seychelles ranks 72nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.