Mali vs Mexico: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mali
58.94
in 2014
Mexico
59.63
in 2014
Mali rank
119th
Mexico rank
117th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mali
  • Mexico
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 59.63 against 58.94 in Mali, a difference of 0.69.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mexico ahead.

Mali ranks 119th and Mexico ranks 117th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 50.19 56.97 6.79 Mexico
2010s 58.94 57.89 1.05 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mali or Mexico?
Mexico, at 59.63 against 58.94 in Mali as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mali and Mexico?
0.69, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mexico?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mali and Mexico rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mali ranks 119th and Mexico ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.