Mauritius vs Niger: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mauritius
65.95
in 2014
Niger
65.75
in 2014
Mauritius rank
93rd
Niger rank
95th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Niger
203040506070200420092014

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 65.95 against 65.75 in Niger, a difference of 0.2.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Niger ahead.

Mauritius ranks 93rd and Niger ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 30.94 56.94 26 Niger
2010s 65.39 63.03 2.36 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Niger?
Mauritius, at 65.95 against 65.75 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Niger?
0.2, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Niger?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and Niger rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mauritius ranks 93rd and Niger ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.