Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mauritius
65.95
in 2014
Zimbabwe
66.32
in 2014
Mauritius rank
93rd
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
203040506070200420092014

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 66.32 against 65.95 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.37.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 181 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 30.94 55.07 24.13 Zimbabwe
2010s 65.39 66.26 0.8693 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 66.32 against 65.95 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.37, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mauritius ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.