Mexico vs Tanzania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mexico
59.63
in 2014
Tanzania
60.1
in 2014
Mexico rank
117th
Tanzania rank
115th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mexico
  • Tanzania
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 60.1 against 59.63 in Mexico, a difference of 0.47.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 117th and Tanzania ranks 115th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 56.97 55.12 1.85 Mexico
2010s 57.89 59.23 1.34 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mexico or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 60.1 against 59.63 in Mexico as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mexico and Tanzania?
0.47, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tanzania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mexico and Tanzania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mexico ranks 117th and Tanzania ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.