Micronesia (country) vs Nigeria: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Micronesia (country)
0
in 2014
Nigeria
22.33
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
179th
Nigeria rank
178th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Nigeria
05101520200420092014

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 22.33 against 0 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 22.33.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 179th and Nigeria ranks 178th of 181 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 0 20.2 20.2 Nigeria
2010s 0 21.91 21.91 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 22.33 against 0 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Nigeria?
22.33, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Nigeria?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Micronesia (country) and Nigeria rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 179th and Nigeria ranks 178th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.