Micronesia (country) vs East Timor: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Micronesia (country)
0
in 2014
East Timor
0
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
179th
East Timor rank
179th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81200420092014

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 0 against 0 in East Timor, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 179th and East Timor ranks 179th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or East Timor?
Micronesia (country), at 0 against 0 in East Timor as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and East Timor?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and East Timor?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Micronesia (country) and East Timor rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 179th and East Timor ranks 179th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.