Moldova vs Portugal: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Moldova
85.53
in 2014
Portugal
83.67
in 2014
Moldova rank
22nd
Portugal rank
24th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Moldova
  • Portugal
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 85.53 against 83.67 in Portugal, a difference of 1.86.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 76.86 63.57 13.29 Moldova
2010s 85.31 83.67 1.64 Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Moldova or Portugal?
Moldova, at 85.53 against 83.67 in Portugal as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Moldova and Portugal?
1.86, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Portugal?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Moldova and Portugal rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Moldova ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.