Moldova vs Qatar: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Moldova
85.53
in 2014
Qatar
83.8
in 2014
Moldova rank
22nd
Qatar rank
23rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Moldova
  • Qatar
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 85.53 against 83.8 in Qatar, a difference of 1.73.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Qatar ahead.

Moldova ranks 22nd and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 78.76 83.8 5.04 Qatar
2010s 85.31 83.8 1.51 Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Moldova or Qatar?
Moldova, at 85.53 against 83.8 in Qatar as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Moldova and Qatar?
1.73, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Moldova and Qatar rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Moldova ranks 22nd and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.