Mongolia vs Oman: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
82.76
in 2014
Oman
81.77
in 2014
Mongolia rank
26th
Oman rank
28th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Oman
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 82.76 against 81.77 in Oman, a difference of 0.99.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 26th and Oman ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Oman Difference Ahead
2000s 82.37 79.63 2.74 Mongolia
2010s 82.66 81.55 1.12 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Oman?
Mongolia, at 82.76 against 81.77 in Oman as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Oman?
0.99, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Oman?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mongolia and Oman rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 26th and Oman ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.