Mongolia vs Qatar: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
82.76
in 2014
Qatar
83.8
in 2014
Mongolia rank
26th
Qatar rank
23rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Qatar
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 83.8 against 82.76 in Mongolia, a difference of 1.04.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 26th and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 82.52 83.8 1.28 Qatar
2010s 82.66 83.8 1.14 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Qatar?
Qatar, at 83.8 against 82.76 in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Qatar?
1.04, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Mongolia and Qatar rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 26th and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.