Montenegro vs Papua New Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 69.03 against 68.2 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.83.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.03 | 68.95 | 2.92 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 66.43 | 69.01 | 2.57 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Montenegro or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 69.03 against 68.2 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.83, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Montenegro and Papua New Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.