Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Mozambique
67.19
in 2014
Zimbabwe
66.32
in 2014
Mozambique rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Zimbabwe
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 67.19 against 66.32 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.87.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mozambique ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 55.78 55.07 0.7075 Mozambique
2010s 61.06 66.26 5.19 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
Mozambique, at 67.19 against 66.32 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
0.87, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Mozambique ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.