Nepal vs Romania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Nepal
80.15
in 2014
Romania
80.98
in 2014
Nepal rank
34th
Romania rank
31st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Romania
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Romania currently reports 80.98 against 80.15 in Nepal, a difference of 0.83.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 34th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 77.24 71.95 5.29 Nepal
2010s 80.03 80.73 0.705 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Nepal or Romania?
Romania, at 80.98 against 80.15 in Nepal as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Nepal and Romania?
0.83, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Romania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Nepal and Romania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Nepal ranks 34th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.