Nepal vs Singapore: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Nepal
80.15
in 2014
Singapore
79.22
in 2014
Nepal rank
34th
Singapore rank
37th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Singapore
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 80.15 against 79.22 in Singapore, a difference of 0.93.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Singapore ahead.

Nepal ranks 34th and Singapore ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 77.24 79.75 2.52 Singapore
2010s 80.03 77.87 2.15 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Nepal or Singapore?
Nepal, at 80.15 against 79.22 in Singapore as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Nepal and Singapore?
0.93, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Singapore?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Nepal and Singapore rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Nepal ranks 34th and Singapore ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.