New Zealand vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 97.06 against 96.66 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 11 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 2nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.02 | 90.91 | 6.11 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 97.05 | 92.87 | 4.18 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, New Zealand or United Arab Emirates?
- New Zealand, at 97.06 against 96.66 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between New Zealand and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.4, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and United Arab Emirates?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 2nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.