North Macedonia vs Tajikistan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 72.06 against 71.27 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.79.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 70th and Tajikistan ranks 67th of 184 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.99 | 74.9 | 14.92 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 69.66 | 70.14 | 0.4851 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 72.06 against 71.27 in North Macedonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Tajikistan?
- 0.79, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Tajikistan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 70th and Tajikistan ranks 67th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.