Oman vs Romania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Oman
81.77
in 2014
Romania
80.98
in 2014
Oman rank
28th
Romania rank
31st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Oman
  • Romania
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Oman currently reports 81.77 against 80.98 in Romania, a difference of 0.79.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 28th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 79.63 71.95 7.68 Oman
2010s 81.55 80.73 0.8165 Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Oman or Romania?
Oman, at 81.77 against 80.98 in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Oman and Romania?
0.79, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Romania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Oman and Romania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Oman ranks 28th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.