Pakistan vs Senegal: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Pakistan
43.43
in 2014
Senegal
44.39
in 2014
Pakistan rank
165th
Senegal rank
162nd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Pakistan
  • Senegal
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 44.39 against 43.43 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.96.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 165th and Senegal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 51.82 30.93 20.89 Pakistan
2010s 38.36 35.66 2.7 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Pakistan or Senegal?
Senegal, at 44.39 against 43.43 in Pakistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Pakistan and Senegal?
0.96, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Senegal?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Pakistan and Senegal rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Pakistan ranks 165th and Senegal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.