Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Pakistan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 44.23 against 43.43 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.8.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 168th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 166th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.15 | 43.79 | 7.36 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 38.36 | 44.14 | 5.77 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Pakistan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 44.23 against 43.43 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.8, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Pakistan ranks 168th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 166th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.