Palau vs Sweden: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Palau
86.25
in 2014
Sweden
88.47
in 2014
Palau rank
20th
Sweden rank
17th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Palau
  • Sweden
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 88.47 against 86.25 in Palau, a difference of 2.22.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sweden ahead.

Palau ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 85.98 88.31 2.33 Sweden
2010s 86 88.52 2.52 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Palau or Sweden?
Sweden, at 88.47 against 86.25 in Palau as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Palau and Sweden?
2.22, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Sweden?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Palau and Sweden rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Palau ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.