Papua New Guinea vs Tunisia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 69.12 against 69.03 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 80th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.93 | 68.3 | 0.6302 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 69.01 | 69.08 | 0.0737 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 69.12 against 69.03 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Tunisia?
- 0.09, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 80th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.