Papua New Guinea vs Palestine, State of: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 69.03 against 68.54 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.49.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd and Palestine, State of ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.93 | 70.31 | 1.38 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 69.01 | 69.67 | 0.6687 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Palestine, State of?
- Papua New Guinea, at 69.03 against 68.54 in Palestine, State of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 0.49, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Palestine, State of rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd and Palestine, State of ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.