Peru vs Turkey: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Peru
76.18
in 2014
Turkey
76.38
in 2014
Peru rank
51st
Turkey rank
50th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Peru
  • Turkey
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 76.38 against 76.18 in Peru, a difference of 0.2.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turkey ahead.

Peru ranks 51st and Turkey ranks 50th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 70.37 75.61 5.24 Turkey
2010s 76.22 75.09 1.12 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Peru or Turkey?
Turkey, at 76.38 against 76.18 in Peru as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Peru and Turkey?
0.2, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Turkey?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Peru and Turkey rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Peru ranks 51st and Turkey ranks 50th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.