Poland vs Taiwan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Poland
80.3
in 2014
Taiwan
80.19
in 2014
Poland rank
32nd
Taiwan rank
33rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Poland
  • Taiwan
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Poland currently reports 80.3 against 80.19 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Taiwan ahead.

Poland ranks 32nd and Taiwan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.

Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 52.63 80.08 27.45 Taiwan
2010s 72.14 80.19 8.04 Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Poland or Taiwan?
Poland, at 80.3 against 80.19 in Taiwan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Poland and Taiwan?
0.11, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Taiwan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Poland and Taiwan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Poland ranks 32nd and Taiwan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.