Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 46.13 against 44.23 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.9.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 163rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 166th of 184 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6 | 43.79 | 1.81 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 46.04 | 44.14 | 1.91 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Puerto Rico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Puerto Rico, at 46.13 against 44.23 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.9, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 163rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 166th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.