Samoa vs Viet Nam: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Samoa
78.38
in 2014
Viet Nam
78.58
in 2014
Samoa rank
43rd
Viet Nam rank
40th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Samoa
  • Viet Nam
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 78.58 against 78.38 in Samoa, a difference of 0.2.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Samoa ranks 43rd and Viet Nam ranks 40th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 61.65 76.15 14.5 Viet Nam
2010s 80.8 78.56 2.25 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Samoa or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 78.58 against 78.38 in Samoa as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Samoa and Viet Nam?
0.2, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Viet Nam?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Samoa and Viet Nam rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Samoa ranks 43rd and Viet Nam ranks 40th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.