Saudi Arabia vs Sweden: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Saudi Arabia
87.77
in 2014
Sweden
88.47
in 2014
Saudi Arabia rank
19th
Sweden rank
17th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Sweden
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 88.47 against 87.77 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.7.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sweden ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 87.77 88.31 0.5383 Sweden
2010s 87.77 88.52 0.7449 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Saudi Arabia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 88.47 against 87.77 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
0.7, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Saudi Arabia and Sweden rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Saudi Arabia ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.