Slovenia vs Vanuatu: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Slovenia
68.1
in 2014
Vanuatu
66.95
in 2014
Slovenia rank
85th
Vanuatu rank
88th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Slovenia
  • Vanuatu
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 68.1 against 66.95 in Vanuatu, a difference of 1.15.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Slovenia ranks 85th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 42.66 38.99 3.67 Slovenia
2010s 63.14 56.44 6.69 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Slovenia or Vanuatu?
Slovenia, at 68.1 against 66.95 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Slovenia and Vanuatu?
1.15, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Vanuatu?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Slovenia and Vanuatu rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Slovenia ranks 85th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.