Spain vs Thailand: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Spain
70.64
in 2014
Thailand
70.92
in 2014
Spain rank
76th
Thailand rank
74th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Spain
  • Thailand
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 70.92 against 70.64 in Spain, a difference of 0.28.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Thailand ahead.

Spain ranks 76th and Thailand ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 70.59 74.05 3.45 Thailand
2010s 69.34 71.46 2.12 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Spain or Thailand?
Thailand, at 70.92 against 70.64 in Spain as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Spain and Thailand?
0.28, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Thailand?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Spain and Thailand rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Spain ranks 76th and Thailand ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.