Austria vs Bhutan: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Austria
- Bhutan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Bhutan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Bhutan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Austria or Bhutan?
- Austria, at 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Austria and Bhutan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bhutan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Bhutan rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Austria ranks 1st and Bhutan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.