Austria vs Hong Kong: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Austria currently reports 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Austria or Hong Kong?
- Austria, at 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Austria and Hong Kong?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Austria ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.