Ecuador vs Georgia: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Ecuador
- Georgia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 87th and Georgia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Ecuador or Georgia?
- Ecuador, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Ecuador and Georgia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Ecuador ranks 87th and Georgia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.