Grenada vs Indonesia: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Grenada
- Indonesia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 98th and Indonesia ranks 98th of 184 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Grenada or Indonesia?
- Grenada, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Grenada and Indonesia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Indonesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Indonesia rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Grenada ranks 98th and Indonesia ranks 98th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.