India vs Malta: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- India
- Malta
How they compare
India currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
India ranks 98th and Malta ranks 98th of 184 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), India or Malta?
- India, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between India and Malta?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do India and Malta rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- India ranks 98th and Malta ranks 98th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.