South Korea vs Lithuania: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)

South Korea
8 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Lithuania
8 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time

  • South Korea
  • Lithuania
02468201520172019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 184 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), South Korea or Lithuania?
South Korea, at 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between South Korea and Lithuania?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Lithuania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Lithuania rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 930 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.