Lithuania vs Rwanda: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Lithuania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Lithuania or Rwanda?
- Lithuania, at 8 DB16-20 methodology against 8 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Lithuania and Rwanda?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Rwanda rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.